Monday, September 7, 2009

Uhh…I don’t know?

To keep up with some of the latest info out there, I do subscribe to a few of the major horse magazines. Equus in particular usually has excellent information in their “Medical Front” section.

They also have sections where various equine professionals answer reader’s questions. While some of the questions are extremely basic, the responses are usually professional, informed, and thorough. In the September issue, however, I believe that one of the responses was, basically, an “I don’t know” covered up with a lot of flowery language.

The question was from a reader with a 12yo horse that she had bred and raised. Every year, this horse was fully vaccinated. Two years ago, there was a bad reaction, so working closely with her vet, they decided to reduce the number of vaccines given at once. Still – bad reaction. This past spring, the vet gave a shot a Benadryl , and then only the rabies vaccine. However, the horse still had the same bad reaction.

For those of you who have never experienced it, reaction to multiple shots does occur with some frequency. The easiest way to avoid it is to spread the shots out. Another option is to give Benadryl (by a vet) in conjunction with the spread-out shots to reduce reaction. This girl seems to have already done both.

The answering professional – a PhD at a large Equine research center, gave this same advice, using almost double the space to do it. In the end, he gave no answer – only advised her to do the same thing, and cautioned against not vaccinating. The thing that I do not understand is why he did not tell her to check for titers for the various vaccines.

Most of us just randomly vaccinate our animals every year with a range of vaccines. However, it has been proved that most vaccines last longer than a year – most MUCH longer. It has also been proved that older animals often retain a “permanently vaccinated” status – the immune system, through repeated vaccinations, permanently recognizes the disease, and re-vaccinating only serves to stress the animal without adding any additional protection. Doing the test for the titers is more expensive (about double –I have looked into it before) than the annual vaccinations themselves, so it is not often requested. However, since there is a long, verified history of annual vaccinations for this horse, as well as the extreme health threat from the vaccinations, it would be very helpful for her to get the tests done. Then she could know with a certainty that her horse is still immune without having to risk the reactions every year. The costs of the tests would be far outweighed, in my opinion, than the stress and health risk of the vaccine reaction. It would also give her documented, verifiable proof for those shows and rides.

The reason this information is not readily available, in my opinion, is that most vets count on those yearly vaccinations to bring animals into their offices for a visit. It serves to get the uniformed public to get care for their animals, but is really pointless for those who educate themselves and know better. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to separate the two. Once you get to know your vet, they will realize that you are not the run-of-the mill public who knows very little about the care of their pet. They will start to trust your judgement, and be glad that they don’t have to spend extra time explaining.

For instance, we recently had a dog break her leg. Since this was a large, energetic dog, we decided to stabilize the leg before loading her up and taking her to the vet. We used our regular materials that we keep on hand – cotton batting to cushion the leg, some thin strips of flat wood moulding to hold the leg straight, more cotton batting, and then finished with vetwrap, snugging the whole thing up to and around her elbow to immobilize the whole leg, top to bottom.

Our regular vet was closed, so we went to a new vet. My husband walked in to ask if they could see her immediately, and they let us jump in front of some non-emergency cases. When we walked her in, the vet and several assistants were waiting to help. She hobbled in on three legs, and the vet looked at the wrap job. He then asked us why we were bringing her in to him if she had already seen a vet. The wrap job looked professional and correct – as if a vet had already seen her and wrapped it for us. There is something to be said for learning enough to handle minor issues or stabilize vet-worthy accidents.

As a last note, research is your friend. Often, vets with long-established practices have not become educated about the latest information. They can be quite resistant to change, but if you find something that will help your pet, research it and then bring that information to your vet. Some do not enjoy being ‘upstaged’, but the better ones will appreciate that you cared enough to bring it to their attention! Doesn’t your pet deserve that small extra effort?

No comments:

Post a Comment